BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//events.la.psu.edu//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20201101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20200308T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:4834-0467640bcb979eb1c83ccaab94d273d3@events.la.psu.edu
DTSTAMP:20260514T181707Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20211019T133000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20211019T144500
SUMMARY:RepRules Seminar Series
DESCRIPTION:\nLindsey J. Schwartz\, a doctoral candidate in the philosop
	hy department at the University of Wisconsin&ndash\;Madison\, will prese
	nt &ldquo\;Social Equity and Reasonable Pluralism: Some Thoughts About D
	emocratic Values and Fidelitous Representation.&rdquo\; Social equity an
	d reasonable pluralism are both vague terms. They are increasingly cast 
	as competing aims of good policy work\, pitted against each other as con
	ceptually incompatible\, and characterized as key players in a pro- vs. 
	anti-democratic struggle. Pluralism cannot account for fine-grained diff
	erences in the life experiences and resulting public interests of differ
	ent groups of people the way that social equity does. Accounting for the
	 difference between social equity and pluralism is vital to good represe
	ntation and positive social outcomes. A focus on the value of social equ
	ity is preferable to a focus on the value of pluralism. Advocates argue 
	that policy work that centers on the aims of social equity tends to make
	 society more democratic than does policy work that centers on the value
	 of pluralism.\n\nIn this talk\, Schwartz pushes back on this narrative.
	 She aims to offer some clarity on the concepts at issue\, including soc
	ial equity\, reasonable pluralism\, and democracy\, and to offer some in
	sight into what it means to represent all people with fidelity without u
	ndercutting\, subverting\, or eroding democratic principles.\n\nSchwartz
	&#39\;s research addresses questions of ethics and policy in criminal ju
	stice\, education\, and law. Her interests include thinking about how so
	ciety is and ought to be disposed toward its members who have less than 
	full agency as a matter of natural or social circumstance.\n\nFor more d
	etails: https://events.la.psu.edu/event/reprules_seminar_series/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><head></head><body><p>Lindsey J. Schw
	artz, a doctoral candidate in the philosophy department at the Universit
	y of Wisconsin&ndash;Madison, will present &ldquo;Social Equity and Reas
	onable Pluralism: Some Thoughts About Democratic Values and Fidelitous R
	epresentation.&rdquo; Social equity and reasonable pluralism are both va
	gue terms. They are increasingly cast as competing aims of good policy w
	ork, pitted against each other as conceptually incompatible, and charact
	erized as key players in a pro- vs. anti-democratic struggle. Pluralism 
	cannot account for fine-grained differences in the life experiences and 
	resulting public interests of different groups of people the way that so
	cial equity does. Accounting for the difference between social equity an
	d pluralism is vital to good representation and positive social outcomes
	. A focus on the value of social equity is preferable to a focus on the 
	value of pluralism. Advocates argue that policy work that centers on the
	 aims of social equity tends to make society more democratic than does p
	olicy work that centers on the value of pluralism.</p><p>In this talk, S
	chwartz pushes back on this narrative. She aims to offer some clarity on
	 the concepts at issue, including social equity, reasonable pluralism, a
	nd democracy, and to offer some insight into what it means to represent 
	all people with fidelity without undercutting, subverting, or eroding de
	mocratic principles.</p><p>Schwartz&#39;s research addresses questions o
	f ethics and policy in criminal justice, education, and law. Her interes
	ts include thinking about how society is and ought to be disposed toward
	 its members who have less than full agency as a matter of natural or so
	cial circumstance.</p><p>For more details: <a href='https://events.la.ps
	u.edu/event/reprules_seminar_series/'>https://events.la.psu.edu/event/re
	prules_seminar_series/</a></p></body></html>
LOCATION:302 Pond Laboratory
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR