BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//events.la.psu.edu//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20201101T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20200308T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:16949-90e0fedcad16fef6913f8a8393bbcf6f@events.la.psu.edu DTSTAMP:20260410T224300Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20210917T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20210917T103000 SUMMARY:Navin Viswanathan and Anne Olmstead - Studying Phonetic Adaptation in In teraction DESCRIPTION:Studying Phonetic Adaptation in Interaction\n\nTypically\, r esearch in speech perception and production has focused on studying indi vidual language users under controlled\, yet arguably atypical\, setting s of language use (the language-as-product framework). While this approa ch has yielded a rich account of the mechanisms and the time course of b asic speech processes\, how well these findings generalize to conditions of actual communication is unclear. A separate body of work that has fo cused on describing interactive language processes (the language-as-acti on framework) offers useful guidance to studying spoken language process es in true communicative interaction.\n\nIn this talk\, I will echo past arguments for the need to study speech perception and production as the y operate simultaneously in true interaction. Focusing on the phonetic l evel\, I will describe how insights from the most prominent model of dia log (the interactive alignment model\; Pickering and Garrod\, 2013\; 200 4) frame our investigation of interactive phonetic processes (Gambi & \; Pickering\, 2013). I will describe some key limitations of this appro ach\, and argue for broadening this enterprise. I will then present data from a recent study that utilizes such an approach (Olmstead\, Viswanth an\, Cowan\, &\; Yang\, 2021). I will conclude by describing a phonet ic synergy account (based on interpersonal dialogic synergy\; Fusaroli\, Rączaszek-Leonardi\, &\; Tylén\, 2014) and discuss its promise and c urrent limitations.\n\nFor more details: https://events.la.psu.edu/event /navin-viswanathan/ X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:

Studying Phonetic Adaptation in Interaction

Typically, research in speech perception and production has foc used on studying individual language users under controlled, yet arguabl y atypical, settings of language use (the language-as-product framework) . While this approach has yielded a rich account of the mechanisms and t he time course of basic speech processes, how well these findings genera lize to conditions of actual communication is unclear. A separate body o f work that has focused on describing interactive language processes (th e language-as-action framework) offers useful guidance to studying spoke n language processes in true communicative interaction.

In this ta lk, I will echo past arguments for the need to study speech perception a nd production as they operate simultaneously in true interaction. Focusi ng on the phonetic level, I will describe how insights from the most pro minent model of dialog (the interactive alignment model; Pickering and G arrod, 2013; 2004) frame our investigation of interactive phonetic proce sses (Gambi & Pickering, 2013). I will describe some key limitations of this approach, and argue for broadening this enterprise. I will then present data from a recent study that utilizes such an approach (Olmste ad, Viswanthan, Cowan, & Yang, 2021). I will conclude by describing a phonetic synergy account (based on interpersonal dialogic synergy; Fus aroli, Rączaszek-Leonardi, & Tylén, 2014) and discuss its promise an d current limitations.

For more details: https://events.la.psu.edu/event/navi n-viswanathan/

END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR