BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//events.la.psu.edu//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20201101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20200308T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:10753-c3da505229866866dbeb52843be51251@events.la.psu.edu
DTSTAMP:20260611T000530Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240216T180000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240216T210000
SUMMARY:Penn State Korean Applied Linguistics Symposium
DESCRIPTION:\n“Beyond grammar\, pronunciation\, and vocabulary—Cutting-e
	dge perspectives\, practices\, paradigms\, tools\, scales\, and theories
	 in assessing Korean learners’ performance and interactional competence”
	\n\n&nbsp\;\n\nDr. Sahie Kang (Professor of Korean\, Director\, Middlebu
	ry Korean School):\n\nGauging improvement in linguistic elements with In
	tegrated Performance Assessment\n\nIntegrated Performance Assessment (IP
	A) has been well received by researchers and practitioners as a language
	 performance assessment tool. IPA provides a new paradigm of relating cl
	assroom instruction to learner assessment\, where learners perform a ser
	ies of communication tasks\, interpretive\, interpersonal\, and presenta
	tional tasks\, under one theme. By performing a series of tasks followed
	 by feedback after each task\, the IPA promotes learners’ progress to me
	et communication goal of the Standards for Foreign Language Learning in 
	the 21st Century (National Standards\, 1999\, 2006) and eventually links
	 students’ performances with successful proficiency learning outcomes. P
	revious studies report that learners improve performances through the IP
	A\, showing positive attitude toward the assessment. The IPA also create
	s ‘washback effect’ on classroom instruction\, leading to teachers’ proa
	ctive employment of authentic materials and application of real-world si
	tuations in class in order to help students’ reaching proficiency object
	ives (Adair-Hauck et al.\, 2006\; Adair-Hauck et al.\, 2013\; Adair-Hauc
	k &amp\; Troyan\, 2013\; Glisan et al.\, 2007\; Huh\, 2020\; Kang\, 2016
	\; Kissau &amp\; Adams\, 2016).\n\n&nbsp\;\n\nYet\, concerns remain\, as
	 with most Performance Assessments\, as to whether IPA will capture lear
	ners acquire linguistic elements. In other words\, there is a general co
	ncern that performance assessments would not measure learners’ acquisiti
	on of linguistic elements such as grammar or vocabulary while they measu
	re global language performance skills. However\, Jung &amp\; Kang (2024)
	 analyzes the learners' language performance data in IPA Performances an
	d confirmed that the acquisition and improvement of not only language pe
	rformances but also linguistic elements such as lexical complexity\, acc
	uracy\, and speech fluency are presented. It analyzes speech production 
	data of the IPA conducted at a post-secondary Korean language immersive 
	setting in two summers. The data collection includes learners’ performan
	ces of interpersonal and presentational tasks and specifically focuses o
	n quantitative data analysis of the speech production from five rounds o
	f the Intermediate-high level IPAs and four rounds of the Advanced level
	 IPAs. Students’ speech samples were transcribed in the CLAN program to 
	find lexical complexity\, accuracy\, and fluency. The results of the spe
	ech production analysis clearly show that while the learner's performanc
	es are improved\, learners’ acquisitions of linguistic elements\, at lea
	st complexity\, accuracy\, and fluency\, are also increased. Of course\,
	 this does not mean that IPA can be used as a tool to evaluate linguisti
	c elements\, but it shows that performance-based learning or evaluation 
	does not necessarily neglect linguistic elements such as complexity\, ac
	curacy\, and fluency.\n\nDr. Sun-Young Shin (신선영)\, Associate Professor\
	, Department of Second Language Studies\, Indiana University:\n\nAssessi
	ng L2 Interactional Competence\n\nIn recent years\, there has been a bur
	geoning interest in the development and assessment of second/foreign lan
	guage (L2) learners' spoken interactional competence. The ability to eng
	age effectively with others is now considered as crucial as producing gr
	ammatically accurate L2 utterances with proficient pronunciation. Despit
	e this acknowledgment\, many L2 teachers still face challenges in elicit
	ing interactive language samples and evaluating L2 learners' interaction
	al competence using suitable classroom-based assessment instruments and 
	rubrics. To navigate the challenges inherent in assessing L2 interaction
	al competence\, this talk extends guidance at both theoretical and opera
	tional levels. It delves into the intricacies of defining interactional 
	competence and the practical aspects of assessing L2 interactional compe
	tence by offering insights into the development and utilization of speci
	fic speaking testing tools and scales. This talk also sheds light on cut
	ting-edge research in the field\, presenting recent studies that contrib
	ute to our understanding of assessing L2 interactional competence. By in
	corporating theoretical frameworks\, practical tools\, and the latest re
	search\, this talk aims to provide a thorough and up-to-date exploration
	 of the multifaceted landscape of L2 interactional competence assessment
	.\n\nFor more details: https://events.la.psu.edu/event/korean-applied-li
	nguistics-symposium/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><head></head><body><p><strong>“Beyond
	 grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary—Cutting-edge perspectives, pract
	ices, paradigms, tools, scales, and theories in assessing Korean learner
	s’ performance and interactional competence”</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p
	><strong>Dr. Sahie Kang</strong> (Professor of Korean, Director, Middleb
	ury Korean School):</p><p><strong>Gauging improvement in linguistic elem
	ents with Integrated Performance Assessment</strong></p><p>Integrated Pe
	rformance Assessment (IPA) has been well received by researchers and pra
	ctitioners as a language performance assessment tool. IPA provides a new
	 paradigm of relating classroom instruction to learner assessment, where
	 learners perform a series of communication tasks, interpretive, interpe
	rsonal, and presentational tasks, under one theme. By performing a serie
	s of tasks followed by feedback after each task, the IPA promotes learne
	rs’ progress to meet communication goal of the Standards for Foreign Lan
	guage Learning in the 21st Century (National Standards, 1999, 2006) and 
	eventually links students’ performances with successful proficiency lear
	ning outcomes. Previous studies report that learners improve performance
	s through the IPA, showing positive attitude toward the assessment. The 
	IPA also creates ‘washback effect’ on classroom instruction, leading to 
	teachers’ proactive employment of authentic materials and application of
	 real-world situations in class in order to help students’ reaching prof
	iciency objectives (Adair-Hauck et al., 2006; Adair-Hauck et al., 2013; 
	Adair-Hauck &amp; Troyan, 2013; Glisan et al., 2007; Huh, 2020; Kang, 20
	16; Kissau &amp; Adams, 2016).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Yet, concerns remain, 
	as with most Performance Assessments, as to whether IPA will capture lea
	rners acquire linguistic elements. In other words, there is a general co
	ncern that performance assessments would not measure learners’ acquisiti
	on of linguistic elements such as grammar or vocabulary while they measu
	re global language performance skills. However, Jung &amp; Kang (2024) a
	nalyzes the learners' language performance data in IPA Performances and 
	confirmed that the acquisition and improvement of not only language perf
	ormances but also linguistic elements such as lexical complexity, accura
	cy, and speech fluency are presented. It analyzes speech production data
	 of the IPA conducted at a post-secondary Korean language immersive sett
	ing in two summers. The data collection includes learners’ performances 
	of interpersonal and presentational tasks and specifically focuses on qu
	antitative data analysis of the speech production from five rounds of th
	e Intermediate-high level IPAs and four rounds of the Advanced level IPA
	s. Students’ speech samples were transcribed in the CLAN program to find
	 lexical complexity, accuracy, and fluency. The results of the speech pr
	oduction analysis clearly show that while the learner's performances are
	 improved, learners’ acquisitions of linguistic elements, at least compl
	exity, accuracy, and fluency, are also increased. Of course, this does n
	ot mean that IPA can be used as a tool to evaluate linguistic elements, 
	but it shows that performance-based learning or evaluation does not nece
	ssarily neglect linguistic elements such as complexity, accuracy, and fl
	uency.</p><p><strong>Dr. Sun-Young Shin (신선영)</strong>, Associate Profes
	sor, Department of Second Language Studies, Indiana University:</p><p><s
	trong>Assessing L2 Interactional Competence</strong></p><p>In recent yea
	rs, there has been a burgeoning interest in the development and assessme
	nt of second/foreign language (L2) learners' spoken interactional compet
	ence. The ability to engage effectively with others is now considered as
	 crucial as producing grammatically accurate L2 utterances with proficie
	nt pronunciation. Despite this acknowledgment, many L2 teachers still fa
	ce challenges in eliciting interactive language samples and evaluating L
	2 learners' interactional competence using suitable classroom-based asse
	ssment instruments and rubrics. To navigate the challenges inherent in a
	ssessing L2 interactional competence, this talk extends guidance at both
	 theoretical and operational levels. It delves into the intricacies of d
	efining interactional competence and the practical aspects of assessing 
	L2 interactional competence by offering insights into the development an
	d utilization of specific speaking testing tools and scales. This talk a
	lso sheds light on cutting-edge research in the field, presenting recent
	 studies that contribute to our understanding of assessing L2 interactio
	nal competence. By incorporating theoretical frameworks, practical tools
	, and the latest research, this talk aims to provide a thorough and up-t
	o-date exploration of the multifaceted landscape of L2 interactional com
	petence assessment.</p><p>For more details: <a href='https://events.la.p
	su.edu/event/korean-applied-linguistics-symposium/'>https://events.la.ps
	u.edu/event/korean-applied-linguistics-symposium/</a></p></body></html>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR