BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//events.la.psu.edu//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20201101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20200308T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:16770-4b3150a2d4adea866dcf134f2117563b@events.la.psu.edu
DTSTAMP:20260416T180821Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20241004T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20241004T103000
SUMMARY:James Stratton
DESCRIPTION:“Where did wer go? From wer to man to guy.\nLexical variatio
	n and change in the semantic field of ‘man’ in the history of English”\n
	\nTo refer to a male adult\, speakers of Present Day English have severa
	l lexical items to choose from (e.g.\, man\, guy\, dude\, fella\, bloke\
	, gentleman). However\, variation within this semantic field is not new.
	 According to The Thesaurus of Old English\, there were at least 25 lexi
	cal items which denoted ‘male adult’ in Old English (e.g.\, guma\, man\,
	 wer) which could occur in referentially comparable contexts. This talk 
	summarizes two studies that use variationist quantitative methods to exa
	mine the evolution of this semantic field throughout the history of the 
	English language. The first study traces changes within this semantic fi
	eld in the early history of English (from Old English to Middle English)
	 and the second study examines more recent changes in Present Day Britis
	h English using two British National spoken corpora.\n\nBoth studies pre
	sent evidence of lexical replacement. In the early history of English we
	r\, the most frequent lexical item for ‘man’\, is gradually replaced by 
	the gender-specific use of man\, a change that is almost complete by Ear
	ly Middle English. As wer decreases in frequency\, man takes on the form
	er function of wer\, with the diachronic shift in frequency following a 
	prototypical s-curve distribution. Language-internal (e.g.\, alliteratio
	n) and language-external factors (e.g.\, text type\, text origin) are fo
	und to significantly affect variation. The results from Present Day Engl
	ish point to another example of lexical replacement within this system\,
	 with man being replaced by guy. Some correlates and potential causes of
	 the replacement are proposed for both changes.\n\nFor more details: htt
	ps://events.la.psu.edu/event/james-stratton/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><head></head><body><h2>“Where did <em
	>wer</em> go? From <em>wer </em>to <em>man</em> to <em>guy</em>.</h2><h2
	>Lexical variation and change in the semantic field of ‘man’ in the hist
	ory of English”</h2><p>To refer to a male adult, speakers of Present Day
	 English have several lexical items to choose from (e.g., <em>man</em>, 
	<em>guy</em>, <em>dude</em>, <em>fella</em>, <em>bloke</em>, <em>gentlem
	an</em>). However, variation within this semantic field is not new. Acco
	rding to <em>The Thesaurus of Old English</em>, there were at least 25 l
	exical items which denoted ‘male adult’ in Old English (e.g., <em>guma</
	em>, <em>man</em>, <em>wer</em>) which could occur in referentially comp
	arable contexts. This talk summarizes two studies that use variationist 
	quantitative methods to examine the evolution of this semantic field thr
	oughout the history of the English language. The first study traces chan
	ges within this semantic field in the early history of English (from Old
	 English to Middle English) and the second study examines more recent ch
	anges in Present Day British English using two British National spoken c
	orpora.</p><p>Both studies present evidence of lexical replacement. In t
	he early history of English <em>wer</em>, the most frequent lexical item
	 for ‘man’, is gradually replaced by the gender-specific use of <em>man<
	/em>, a change that is almost complete by Early Middle English. As <em>w
	er</em> decreases in frequency, <em>man</em> takes on the former functio
	n of <em>wer</em>, with the diachronic shift in frequency following a pr
	ototypical s-curve distribution. Language-internal (e.g., alliteration) 
	and language-external factors (e.g., text type, text origin) are found t
	o significantly affect variation. The results from Present Day English p
	oint to another example of lexical replacement within this system, with 
	<em>man</em> being replaced by <em>guy</em>. Some correlates and potenti
	al causes of the replacement are proposed for both changes.</p><p>For mo
	re details: <a href='https://events.la.psu.edu/event/james-stratton/'>ht
	tps://events.la.psu.edu/event/james-stratton/</a></p></body></html>
LOCATION:102 Foster Auditorium, Paterno Library
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR