BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//events.la.psu.edu//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20201101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20200308T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:16906-3ecdcced1d0210b51f64617bd78f3413@events.la.psu.edu
DTSTAMP:20260307T144318Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20210226T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20210226T103000
SUMMARY:Filiz Rızaoğlu (Pamukkale University) - Morphological Processing in Late
	 L2 Learners
DESCRIPTION:Morphological Processing in Late L2 Learners\nThe issue of v
	ariability in processing morphologically complex words has been investig
	ated in relation to the specific processing patterns second language (L2
	) users adopt. While several studies report lack of sensitivity to morph
	ological structure in late L2 learners (Bowden et al.\, 2010\; Neubauer 
	&amp\; Clahsen\, 2009\; Silva &amp\; Clahsen 2008)\, some reveal similar
	 processing patterns in native and non-native speakers despite overall s
	lower reaction times (RTs) in L2 participants (Basnight-Brown et al.\, 2
	007\; Coughlin &amp\;Tremblay\, 2015\; Diependaele et al.\, 2011\; Feldm
	an et al.\, 2010\; Foote 2017). In the present study\, proficient L2 spe
	akers’ processing of English past tense morphology was investigated to u
	nderstand whether their processing patterns were comparable with that of
	 native speakers of English. In a masked priming task\, the RTs for regu
	lar and irregular verbs were measured. The study also sought to explore 
	whether working memory (WM) has any relationship with L2 morphological p
	rocessing. Comparable processing patterns in native and nonnative groups
	 obtained in the present study do not support earlier views that late L2
	 learners are less sensitive to the morphological structure of the targe
	t language compared to native speakers. Despite the lack of qualitative 
	differences in processing\, quantitative differences were found in the f
	orm of slower RTs in the L2 English group. While no correlation was foun
	d between the morphological processing patterns and WM in either partici
	pant group\, a negative relationship was found between the WM scores and
	 the speed of word recognition in the L2 group.\n\nFor more details: htt
	ps://events.la.psu.edu/event/filiz-rizaoglu-pamukkale-university-morphol
	ogical-processing-in-late-l2-learners/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><head></head><body><h2 class="Default
	" style="text-align: center; ">Morphological Processing in Late L2 Learn
	ers</h2><p class="Default" style="text-align: justify; ">The issue of va
	riability in processing morphologically complex words has been investiga
	ted in relation to the specific processing patterns second language (L2)
	 users adopt. While several studies report lack of sensitivity to morpho
	logical structure in late L2 learners (Bowden et al., 2010; Neubauer &am
	p; Clahsen, 2009; Silva &amp; Clahsen 2008), some reveal similar process
	ing patterns in native and non-native speakers despite overall slower re
	action times (RTs) in L2 participants (Basnight-Brown et al., 2007; Coug
	hlin &amp;Tremblay, 2015; Diependaele et al., 2011; Feldman et al., 2010
	; Foote 2017). In the present study, proficient L2 speakers’ processing 
	of English past tense morphology was investigated to understand whether 
	their processing patterns were comparable with that of native speakers o
	f English. In a masked priming task, the RTs for regular and irregular v
	erbs were measured. The study also sought to explore whether working mem
	ory (WM) has any relationship with L2 morphological processing. Comparab
	le processing patterns in native and nonnative groups obtained in the pr
	esent study do not support earlier views that late L2 learners are less 
	sensitive to the morphological structure of the target language compared
	 to native speakers. Despite the lack of qualitative differences in proc
	essing, quantitative differences were found in the form of slower RTs in
	 the L2 English group. While no correlation was found between the morpho
	logical processing patterns and WM in either participant group, a negati
	ve relationship was found between the WM scores and the speed of word re
	cognition in the L2 group.</p><p>For more details: <a href='https://even
	ts.la.psu.edu/event/filiz-rizaoglu-pamukkale-university-morphological-pr
	ocessing-in-late-l2-learners/'>https://events.la.psu.edu/event/filiz-riz
	aoglu-pamukkale-university-morphological-processing-in-late-l2-learners/
	</a></p></body></html>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR