BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//events.la.psu.edu//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20201101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20200308T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:5643-525e1f6e5f2b8150fe38a6615467f11c@events.la.psu.edu
DTSTAMP:20260609T104927Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20200427T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20200427T143000
SUMMARY:Expanding Empathy Speaker Series: Paul Conway
DESCRIPTION:\nTitle:&nbsp\;Marrying Deontology and Utilitarianism with V
	irtue Ethics: Balancing Affective with Cognitive Processing Predicts Inc
	reased Prosociality and Reduced Antisociality\n\nAbstract:&nbsp\;For mil
	lennia\, philosophers and scientists have debated whether morality prima
	rily entails rational or emotional processing\, while engaging in a seco
	nd debate regarding whether to focus on the morality of specific actions
	 versus the moral tendencies of individuals. Across 15 studies (N ~ 5000
	)\, I will aim to reconcile these debates by suggesting theoretical inte
	gration: people who tend to be most moral (virtue ethics) demonstrate a 
	balance of affective and cognitive processing\, which leads them to a ba
	lanced consideration of utilitarian and deontological ethical concerns a
	t the level of individual moral decisions. People balancing affective wi
	th cognitive processing demonstrate increased prosociality and reduced a
	ntisociality on a variety of measures. Neither an absolute focus on rati
	onality nor emotionality\, nor on exclusively deontological or utilitari
	an concerns\, is associated with enhanced morality. Such findings requir
	e a conceptual overhaul of moral dilemma research and clarify the psycho
	logy of moral excellence.\n\nBio:&nbsp\;Paul Conway is Assistant Profess
	or of Psychology at Florida State University and received his PhD from t
	he University of Western Ontario in 2013.&nbsp\;I study the psychology o
	f morality and justice: How people think about good and bad\, right and 
	wrong\, and whether to help or harm others. Some of my work examines the
	 surprisingly complex ways that moral self-perceptions influence prosoci
	al behavior. Doing so not only advances theory\, but also suggests simpl
	e techniques for encouraging prosociality--for example\, try reminding a
	 friend of something good they did over a year ago and they will be more
	 likely to help you today. For my dissertation\, I applied a technique c
	alled process dissociation to moral dilemma decisions where causing harm
	 maximizes outcomes. This procedure independently estimates the roles of
	 affective reactions to harm versus cognitive evaluations of outcomes in
	 moral decision-making\, thereby clarifying several conundrums in the fi
	eld. Currently\, I&#39\;m developing a model of individual differences i
	n moral judgment\, and examining how morality impacts person perception.
	 I won the 2014 Dissertation Award from the Society for Experimental Soc
	ial Psychology\, the 2014 Governor General&#39\;s Academic Gold Medal\, 
	and the 2013 Student Publication Award from the Society for Personality 
	and Social Psychology.&nbsp\;My work primarily focuses on two streams. F
	irst\, I aim to clarify conceptual confusion regarding the processes und
	erlying moral dilemma judgments where causing harm maximizes outcomes. T
	his work involves techniques such as process dissociation\, as well as a
	 new model of individual differences in moral thinking styles. Second\, 
	I am increasingly interested in social perceptions of moral judgments&md
	ash\;how and why people react to others&#39\; moral judgments\, and how 
	people adjust moral judgments to present themselves in socially optimal 
	ways. Beyond that\, my interests are wide-ranging\, including work on pr
	osocial behavior\, self-sacrifice\, religiosity\, cultural differences\,
	 social rejection\, self-control\, regret\, and political decision-makin
	g.\n\nThe Expanding Empathy Speaker Series is sponsored by the Moral Age
	ncy and Moral Development Initiative in the Rock Ethics Institute\,&nbsp
	\;with support from the College of the Liberal Arts\, the College of Hea
	lth and Human Development\, the Department of Psychology\, the Edna Benn
	ett Pierce Prevention Research Center\, and the University Libraries.\n\
	nFor more details: https://events.la.psu.edu/event/expanding_empathy_spe
	aker_series_paul_conway/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><head></head><body><p><b>Title:</b>&n
	bsp;Marrying Deontology and Utilitarianism with Virtue Ethics: Balancing
	 Affective with Cognitive Processing Predicts Increased Prosociality and
	 Reduced Antisociality</p><p><b>Abstract:</b>&nbsp;For millennia, philos
	ophers and scientists have debated whether morality primarily entails ra
	tional or emotional processing, while engaging in a second debate regard
	ing whether to focus on the morality of specific actions versus the mora
	l tendencies of individuals. Across 15 studies (N ~ 5000), I will aim to
	 reconcile these debates by suggesting theoretical integration: people w
	ho tend to be most moral (virtue ethics) demonstrate a balance of affect
	ive and cognitive processing, which leads them to a balanced considerati
	on of utilitarian and deontological ethical concerns at the level of ind
	ividual moral decisions. People balancing affective with cognitive proce
	ssing demonstrate increased prosociality and reduced antisociality on a 
	variety of measures. Neither an absolute focus on rationality nor emotio
	nality, nor on exclusively deontological or utilitarian concerns, is ass
	ociated with enhanced morality. Such findings require a conceptual overh
	aul of moral dilemma research and clarify the psychology of moral excell
	ence.</p><p>Bio:&nbsp;Paul Conway is Assistant Professor of Psychology a
	t Florida State University and received his PhD from the University of W
	estern Ontario in 2013.&nbsp;I study the psychology of morality and just
	ice: How people think about good and bad, right and wrong, and whether t
	o help or harm others. Some of my work examines the surprisingly complex
	 ways that moral self-perceptions influence prosocial behavior. Doing so
	 not only advances theory, but also suggests simple techniques for encou
	raging prosociality--for example, try reminding a friend of something go
	od they did over a year ago and they will be more likely to help you tod
	ay. For my dissertation, I applied a technique called process dissociati
	on to moral dilemma decisions where causing harm maximizes outcomes. Thi
	s procedure independently estimates the roles of affective reactions to 
	harm versus cognitive evaluations of outcomes in moral decision-making, 
	thereby clarifying several conundrums in the field. Currently, I&#39;m d
	eveloping a model of individual differences in moral judgment, and exami
	ning how morality impacts person perception. I won the 2014 Dissertation
	 Award from the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, the 2014 Gov
	ernor General&#39;s Academic Gold Medal, and the 2013 Student Publicatio
	n Award from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology.&nbsp;My 
	work primarily focuses on two streams. First, I aim to clarify conceptua
	l confusion regarding the processes underlying moral dilemma judgments w
	here causing harm maximizes outcomes. This work involves techniques such
	 as process dissociation, as well as a new model of individual differenc
	es in moral thinking styles. Second, I am increasingly interested in soc
	ial perceptions of moral judgments&mdash;how and why people react to oth
	ers&#39; moral judgments, and how people adjust moral judgments to prese
	nt themselves in socially optimal ways. Beyond that, my interests are wi
	de-ranging, including work on prosocial behavior, self-sacrifice, religi
	osity, cultural differences, social rejection, self-control, regret, and
	 political decision-making.</p><p>The Expanding Empathy Speaker Series i
	s sponsored by the Moral Agency and Moral Development Initiative in the 
	Rock Ethics Institute,&nbsp;with support from the College of the Liberal
	 Arts, the College of Health and Human Development, the Department of Ps
	ychology, the Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, and the Un
	iversity Libraries.</p><p>For more details: <a href='https://events.la.p
	su.edu/event/expanding_empathy_speaker_series_paul_conway/'>https://even
	ts.la.psu.edu/event/expanding_empathy_speaker_series_paul_conway/</a></p
	></body></html>
URL:https://rockethics.psu.edu/events/expanding-empathy-speaker-series-paul-
	conway
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR