BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//events.la.psu.edu//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20201101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20200308T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:5052-20bc030198d07d98501fa0ee657b6a1c@events.la.psu.edu
DTSTAMP:20260627T190009Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20210407T160000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20210407T170000
SUMMARY:Expanding Empathy Lecture Series: Jim A.C. Everett
DESCRIPTION:\nLecture title:&nbsp\;&quot\;Switching Tracks? A Two-Dimens
	ional Model of Utilitarian Psychology&quot\;\n\nAbstract:&nbsp\;A great 
	deal of work in moral psychology has used sacrificial trolley-style dile
	mmas to shed light on the psychological processes and individual differe
	nces associated with &ldquo\;utilitarianism.&rdquo\; Such work has yield
	ed important insight into our understanding of instrumental harm\, but t
	here are other&mdash\;more prototypical&mdash\;ways in which utilitarian
	ism\, as an ethical theory\, departs from common sense moral intuitions.
	 While utilitarianism permits harming innocent individuals when this max
	imizes aggregate utility (instrumental harm)\, it also tells us to treat
	 with equal importance the interests of all individuals affected\, witho
	ut giving priority to oneself or those to whom one is especially close (
	impartial beneficence). While more fundamental to the utilitarian ideal\
	, such impartial beneficence has received scant empirical attention. I w
	ill present work showing that these dimensions are not merely conceptual
	ly distinct but empirically distinct\, presenting research documenting d
	istinct patterns of individual differences\, evidence they are underpinn
	ed by different processes\, and work (including from a large-scale inter
	national study in the COVID-19 pandemic) showing they have distinct cons
	equences for social evaluation. If we wish to understand proto-utilitari
	an psychology&mdash\;and especially if we want to draw normative conclus
	ions from such work&mdash\;it&nbsp\;is crucial to adopt a multidimension
	al approach\, looking at both instrumental harm and impartial beneficenc
	e.\n\nPlease register here:&nbsp\;bit.ly/EE21Everett\n\nFor more details
	: https://events.la.psu.edu/event/ee-jimaceverett_0407/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><head></head><body><p><b>Lecture titl
	e:&nbsp;</b><i>&quot;Switching Tracks? A Two-Dimensional Model of Utilit
	arian Psychology&quot;</i></p><p><b>Abstract:&nbsp;</b><i>A great deal o
	f work in moral psychology has used sacrificial trolley-style dilemmas t
	o shed light on the psychological processes and individual differences a
	ssociated with &ldquo;utilitarianism.&rdquo; Such work has yielded impor
	tant insight into our understanding of instrumental harm, but there are 
	other</i>&mdash;<i>more prototypical</i>&mdash;<i>ways in which utilitar
	ianism, as an ethical theory, departs from common sense moral intuitions
	. While utilitarianism permits harming innocent individuals when this ma
	ximizes aggregate utility (instrumental harm), it also tells us to treat
	 with equal importance the interests of all individuals affected, withou
	t giving priority to oneself or those to whom one is especially close (i
	mpartial beneficence). While more fundamental to the utilitarian ideal, 
	such impartial beneficence has received scant empirical attention. I wil
	l present work showing that these dimensions are not merely conceptually
	 distinct but empirically distinct, presenting research documenting dist
	inct patterns of individual differences, evidence they are underpinned b
	y different processes, and work (including from a large-scale internatio
	nal study in the COVID-19 pandemic) showing they have distinct consequen
	ces for social evaluation. If we wish to understand proto-utilitarian ps
	ychology</i>&mdash;<i>and especially if we want to draw normative conclu
	sions from such work</i>&mdash;it&nbsp;<i>is crucial to adopt a multidim
	ensional approach, looking at both instrumental harm and impartial benef
	icence.</i></p><p>Please register here:&nbsp;<a href="https://bit.ly/EE2
	1Everett">bit.ly/EE21Everett</a></p><p>For more details: <a href='https:
	//events.la.psu.edu/event/ee-jimaceverett_0407/'>https://events.la.psu.e
	du/event/ee-jimaceverett_0407/</a></p></body></html>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR