BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//events.la.psu.edu//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20201101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20200308T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:17030-3e7d9d6954c93ff6c0533587c87c9218@events.la.psu.edu
DTSTAMP:20260911T224608Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240322T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240322T103000
SUMMARY:Dr. Carrie Jackson
DESCRIPTION:“How Prediction and Adaptation Leads to Learning Among Begin
	ning and Intermediate L2 Learners”\n\nCarrie Jackson Ph.D.\n\nProfessor 
	&amp\; Department Head\, Penn State\n\nDepartment of Germanic and Slavic
	 Languages\n\nand Literatures\n\nSome argue that structural priming and 
	adaptation rely on implicit learning mechanisms\, involving adjustment t
	o linguistic representations due to experiencing prediction error (e.g.\
	, Chang et al.\, 2006). This view of priming as implicit learning has ga
	ined interest in L2 acquisition\, yet the nature and magnitude of adapta
	tion among L2 speakers does not always parallel that of L1 speakers (see
	 Jackson\, 2018\, for review). A possible explanation lies in potential 
	differences in how much L1 and L2 speakers engage in predictive processi
	ng: If L2 learners are less likely to engage in prediction\, they would 
	experience less prediction error\, and consequently less adaptation. Und
	er this account\, if L2 learners are explicitly forced to predict the st
	ructure of an upcoming (prime) sentence\, they will be more likely to ex
	perience prediction error\, and hence show greater priming and adaptatio
	n. In this talk\, Carrie Jackson will present results from several recen
	t studies showing that explicitly forcing learners to predict the struct
	ure of an upcoming (prime) sentence leads to greater priming and adaptat
	ion compared to simply copying a prime sentence (e.g.\, Grüter et al.\, 
	2021). Findings implicate prediction as a possible learning mechanism in
	 both beginning and intermediate-level L2 learners\, but they also highl
	ight the limits of such a mechanism for fostering longer-term learning a
	nd learning that extends to the development of more generalizable gramma
	tical knowledge\, especially among beginning-level learners.\n\nFor more
	 details: https://events.la.psu.edu/event/dr-susanne-brouwer-radboud-uni
	versity/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><head></head><body><p style="text-ali
	gn: center"><strong>“How Prediction and Adaptation Leads </strong><stron
	g>to Learning Among Beginning and </strong><strong>Intermediate L2 Learn
	ers”</strong></p><p style="text-align: center">Carrie Jackson Ph.D.<br /
	>Professor &amp; Department Head, Penn State<br />Department of Germanic
	 and Slavic Languages<br />and Literatures</p><p>Some argue that structu
	ral priming and adaptation rely on implicit learning mechanisms, involvi
	ng adjustment to linguistic representations due to experiencing predicti
	on error (e.g., Chang et al., 2006). This view of priming as implicit le
	arning has gained interest in L2 acquisition, yet the nature and magnitu
	de of adaptation among L2 speakers does not always parallel that of L1 s
	peakers (see Jackson, 2018, for review). A possible explanation lies in 
	potential differences in how much L1 and L2 speakers engage in predictiv
	e processing: If L2 learners are less likely to engage in prediction, th
	ey would experience less prediction error, and consequently less adaptat
	ion. Under this account, if L2 learners are explicitly forced to predict
	 the structure of an upcoming (prime) sentence, they will be more likely
	 to experience prediction error, and hence show greater priming and adap
	tation. In this talk, Carrie Jackson will present results from several r
	ecent studies showing that explicitly forcing learners to predict the st
	ructure of an upcoming (prime) sentence leads to greater priming and ada
	ptation compared to simply copying a prime sentence (e.g., Grüter et al.
	, 2021). Findings implicate prediction as a possible learning mechanism 
	in both beginning and intermediate-level L2 learners, but they also high
	light the limits of such a mechanism for fostering longer-term learning 
	and learning that extends to the development of more generalizable gramm
	atical knowledge, especially among beginning-level learners.</p><p>For m
	ore details: <a href='https://events.la.psu.edu/event/dr-susanne-brouwer
	-radboud-university/'>https://events.la.psu.edu/event/dr-susanne-brouwer
	-radboud-university/</a></p></body></html>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR