BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//events.la.psu.edu//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20201101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20200308T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:16936-b5a8bc67aa6b79b934f277f361190534@events.la.psu.edu
DTSTAMP:20260712T060900Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20180427T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20180427T103000
SUMMARY:CLS Speaker Series - Kinsey Bice (Penn State) Dynamics of Language Proce
	ssing and the Consequences  For New Language Learning:  A talk and disse
	rtation defense
DESCRIPTION:Dynamics of Language Processing and the Consequences \nFor N
	ew Language Learning:&nbsp\; A talk and dissertation defense\n\nLearning
	 a new language as an adult is difficult and many fail to acquire high p
	roficiency. Individual differences in late language learning have been p
	artially\, but not fully\, accounted for by factors such as working memo
	ry and native language (L1) performance. An overlooked observation in re
	search that attempts to characterize successful language learning is tha
	t bilinguals consistently outperform monolinguals in acquiring new langu
	ages. When bilinguals are learning a new language\, they can draw on the
	ir past experience. That experience encompasses both language-specific s
	kills\, such as managing the dynamics of cross-language interaction\, as
	 well as domain-general learning skills that may enable language regulat
	ion and control. In contrast\, for monolingual learners\, there is only 
	the opportunity to transfer existing L1 knowledge and general cognitive 
	skills. The hypothesis tested in the research I will present is that pre
	vious language experience and individual differences guide the trajector
	y and outcome of new language learning. In one study\, I consider how bi
	ases in domain-general learning contribute to individual differences in 
	language processing for monolinguals and bilinguals with different langu
	age learning experience. In a second study\, I examine the consequences 
	of domain-general and language-specific biases for bilinguals and monoli
	nguals as they learn a new language.\n\nFor more details: https://events
	.la.psu.edu/event/cls-speaker-series-kinsey-bice-penn-state-dynamics-of-
	language-processing-and-the-consequences-for-new-language-learning-a-tal
	k-and-dissertation-defense/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><head></head><body><h2 class=" " styl
	e="text-align: center; "><b>Dynamics of Language Processing and the Cons
	equences </b></h2><h2 class=" " style="text-align: center; "><b>For New 
	Language Learning:&nbsp; A talk and dissertation defense</b></h2><p><b><
	br></b></p><p>Learning a new language as an adult is difficult and many 
	fail to acquire high proficiency. Individual differences in late languag
	e learning have been partially, but not fully, accounted for by factors 
	such as working memory and native language (L1) performance. An overlook
	ed observation in research that attempts to characterize successful lang
	uage learning is that bilinguals consistently outperform monolinguals in
	 acquiring new languages. When bilinguals are learning a new language, t
	hey can draw on their past experience. That experience encompasses both 
	language-specific skills, such as managing the dynamics of cross-languag
	e interaction, as well as domain-general learning skills that may enable
	 language regulation and control. In contrast, for monolingual learners,
	 there is only the opportunity to transfer existing L1 knowledge and gen
	eral cognitive skills. The hypothesis tested in the research I will pres
	ent is that previous language experience and individual differences guid
	e the trajectory and outcome of new language learning. In one study, I c
	onsider how biases in domain-general learning contribute to individual d
	ifferences in language processing for monolinguals and bilinguals with d
	ifferent language learning experience. In a second study, I examine the 
	consequences of domain-general and language-specific biases for bilingua
	ls and monolinguals as they learn a new language.</p><p><b><br></b></p><
	p>For more details: <a href='https://events.la.psu.edu/event/cls-speaker
	-series-kinsey-bice-penn-state-dynamics-of-language-processing-and-the-c
	onsequences-for-new-language-learning-a-talk-and-dissertation-defense/'>
	https://events.la.psu.edu/event/cls-speaker-series-kinsey-bice-penn-stat
	e-dynamics-of-language-processing-and-the-consequences-for-new-language-
	learning-a-talk-and-dissertation-defense/</a></p></body></html>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR